Left Bundle Branch Pacing: Advanced physiological cardiac pacing for optimal cardiac resynchronization
In modern electrophysiology, left bundle branch pacing (stimulation of the left Tawara leg) has established itself as a pioneering method for physiological cardiac stimulation. This innovative technique represents the continuing evolution of cardiac pacing therapy away from conventional right ventricular pacing towards more physiologic forms of pacing. The following article highlights the anatomical principles, technical aspects, clinical advantages and future prospects of left bundle branch pacing as a promising alternative to both conventional pacemaker therapy and other physiological pacing methods.
The evolution of physiological cardiac stimulation
Conventional pacemaker techniques and their limitations
Traditional pacing therapy is based on right ventricular pacing, where the lead is typically placed at the apex of the right ventricle or right ventricular septum. However, this method bypasses the heart’s natural conduction system and leads to an asynchronous contraction of the ventricles, similar to a left bundle branch block (LBBB).
The long-term disadvantages of this non-physiological stimulation can be severe:
- Uncoordinated ventricular contraction
- Deterioration of left ventricular function
- Increased risk of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PIC)
- Increased prevalence of heart failure and atrial fibrillation
- Reduced quality of life and increased mortality
The concept of physiological pacemaker therapy
Recognizing these disadvantages has led to the development of more physiological pacing methods that aim to mimic natural cardiac activation. Conduction system pacing uses the intrinsic conduction system of the heart to achieve more synchronized ventricular activation.
The two most important approaches to conduction system pacing are:
- His bundle pacing (HBP – His bundle pacing): Direct stimulation of the His bundle, the only electrical connection between the atria and ventricles.
- Left Bundle Branch Pacing (LBBP – stimulation of the left Tawara bundle branch): Targeted stimulation of the left bundle branch of the conduction system deep in the interventricular septum.
While His bundle pacing is conceptually the most physiologic stimulation method, it is limited by technical challenges, higher pacing thresholds and limited applicability in patients with conduction disturbances in the His-Purkinje system. These limitations have led to the development of left bundle branch pacing as an alternative physiologic stimulation method.
Anatomical and electrophysiological principles of left bundle branch pacing
The left ventricular conduction system
The left bundle branch is a direct continuation of the bundle of His. After passing through the fibrous cardiac skeleton, the His bundle divides into the right and left bundle branches. The left bundle branch spreads out in a fan shape over the endocardial surface of the left ventricle and branches further into three main fascicles:
- The anterior fascicle (left anterior fascicle)
- The posterior fascicle (left posterior fascicle)
- The septal fascicle (Left Septal Fascicle)
This anatomical arrangement enables rapid electrical activation of the large left ventricular myocardium. The central role of the left leg in the coordinated contraction of both ventricles makes it an ideal target for physiological cardiac stimulation.
The electrophysiological rationale for left bundle branch pacing
Left bundle branch pacing aims to directly stimulate the left bundle branch to achieve synchronous activation of the left ventricular myocardium. This offers several theoretical and practical advantages:
- Physiological activation sequence: Stimulation of the left leg leads to an almost natural spread of excitation in the left ventricle.
- Overcoming proximal conduction blocks: In patients with proximal blockages in the His-Purkinje system, direct stimulation of the distal left leg can bypass this blockage.
- Stable stimulation parameters: Compared to His Bundle Pacing, Left Bundle Branch Pacing typically offers lower and more stable stimulation thresholds (capture thresholds).
- Technical feasibility: The implantation procedure can be less technically demanding than His Bundle Pacing with a higher success rate.
Implantation technique of left bundle branch pacing
Technical requirements
Successful implantation of a left bundle branch pacing electrode requires specialized equipment and in-depth knowledge of cardiac anatomy:
- Specialized delivery systems with a suitable curve for septal navigation
- Actively fixable screw electrodes with sufficient helix length
- High-resolution fluoroscopy in various projections
- Programmable stimulation and measuring devices
- Electrocardiographic monitoring with 12-lead ECG
- Elektrokardiografisches Monitoring mit 12-Kanal-EKG

Step-by-step implantation procedure
The implantation of a left bundle branch pacing electrode follows a systematic approach:
- Venous access: Similar to conventional pacemakers, access is created via the subclavian or cephalic vein.
- Identification of the target area: The optimal target point is typically in the mid to apical region of the right ventricular septum, approximately 1-2 cm distal to the His bundle.
- Electrode positioning: The electrode is positioned perpendicular to the interventricular septum under fluoroscopic guidance.
- Deep penetration into the septum: The screw electrode is screwed deep into the septum until it approaches or grasps the left thigh.
- Electrocardiographic verification: Correct positioning is confirmed by characteristic ECG changes during pacing, in particular by:
– Left vector QRS morphology in the limb leads
– Right vector QRS morphology in V1
– Significant shortening of the QRS duration compared to right ventricular stimulation - Measurement of the stimulation parameters: Determination of stimulation thresholds and impedances to ensure a stable electrode position.
Differentiation between different stimulation patterns
Various stimulation patterns can be observed with left bundle branch pacing:
- Selective left bundle branch capture: Exclusive stimulation of the left bundle branch, recognizable by the very short stimulus-to-QRS time and narrow QRS complex.
- Non-selective left bundle branch capture: Simultaneous stimulation of the left bundle branch and the surrounding septum, recognizable by a pseudo-delta wave at the beginning of the QRS complex.
- Myocardial capture: stimulation without capture of the left leg, recognizable by a wider QRS complex with right ventricular stimulation morphology.
Identifying the stimulation pattern is crucial for optimizing programming and long-term therapy efficiency.
Clinical advantages of left bundle branch pacing
Electrophysiological advantages
Left bundle branch pacing offers several electrophysiological advantages over conventional right ventricular pacing:
- Narrow QRS complex: Direct stimulation of the specific conduction system leads to a narrower QRS duration, reflecting a more synchronized ventricular activation.
- More physiologic activation sequence: Excitation propagation through the natural conduction system leads to a more coordinated ventricular contraction.
- Shortened interventricular and intraventricular conduction times: This improves electrical synchrony between and within the ventricles.
Hemodynamic improvements
The more physiological electrical activation through left bundle branch pacing leads to measurable hemodynamic benefits:
- Improved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF)
- Optimized stroke volume
- Reduced mitral regurgitation
- Improved diastolic function
- More favorable ventricular remodeling processes (cardiac remodeling)
Clinical results
Growing clinical evidence suggests significant benefits of left bundle branch pacing in terms of important clinical endpoints:
- Reduced risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy
- Improved stress tolerance and quality of life
- Lower hospitalization rates due to heart failure
- Potentially reduced overall mortality
Use for special patient groups
Left bundle branch pacing shows particular potential for certain patient groups:
- Patients with high ventricular pacing requirements: In patients with AV block and frequent ventricular pacing, left bundle branch pacing can reduce the risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy.
- Patients with left or right bundle branch block: Left bundle branch pacing can improve cardiac synchrony in the event of disturbances in the conduction system.
- CRT candidates with difficult coronary sinus anatomy: As an alternative to conventional Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) in cases of unfavorable anatomy for left ventricular lead placement.
- Non-responders to conventional CRT: In patients without an adequate response to conventional CRT, left bundle branch pacing can be an alternative therapy.
Comparison with other stimulation methods
Left bundle branch pacing versus conventional right ventricular pacing
Compared to conventional right ventricular pacing, left bundle branch pacing offers several advantages:
- Narrower QRS complex
- More physiological ventricular activation
- Better hemodynamic parameters
- Lower risk of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy
- Improved clinical outcomes
The main disadvantages are the technically more demanding implantation and the limited long-term experience.
Left Bundle Branch Pacing versus His Bundle Pacing
Compared to His Bundle Pacing, Left Bundle Branch Pacing offers both advantages and disadvantages:
Advantages compared to His Bundle Pacing:
- Lower and more stable stimulation thresholds
- Lower risk of stimulus QRS prolongation over time
- Higher implantation success rate
- Broader applicability for patients with His-Purkinje disorders
Disadvantages compared to His Bundle Pacing:
- Less physiological activation of the right ventricle
- More invasive technique with deeper septal penetration
- Higher risk of septal perforation
- Limited long-term follow-up period
Left Bundle Branch Pacing versus CRT
As an alternative to conventional CRT (cardiac resynchronization therapy), left bundle branch pacing can offer certain advantages:
- Simpler implantation technique without the need for coronary sinus cannulation
- More physiological electrical activation
- Lower risk of electrode dislocation
- Potentially higher responder rate
However, optimal patient selection for left bundle branch pacing versus CRT requires further investigation and larger randomized trials.
Technical challenges and limitations
Despite the promising results, left bundle branch pacing is associated with specific challenges:
Technical implantation aspects
- Learning curve: The implantation technique requires specific expertise and a certain learning curve.
- Deep septal penetration: The risk of septal perforation or ventricular septal defect, although rare, is higher than with conventional techniques.
- Identification of the optimal pacing site: Electrocardiographic confirmation of correct pacing can be complex.
Limitations of the method
- Limited long-term experience: The long-term stability and safety of the method still needs to be confirmed by larger studies with longer follow-up.
- Lack of randomized controlled trials: Large randomized trials comparing left bundle branch pacing with other pacing methods are still lacking.
- Standardization of the technique: There are still no fully standardized criteria for optimal electrode placement and programming.
Patient-specific restrictions
Not all patients are suitable candidates for left bundle branch pacing:
- Patients with extensive septal scars
- Patients with distal blockages in the left thigh
- Patients with significant right ventricular dysfunction
- Patients with complex congenital heart defects and modified anatomy
Future prospects and current developments
Technological innovations
Continuous technological development promises to address some of the current limitations:
- Specialized electrodes: Optimized electrode designs for left bundle branch pacing with improved controllability and fixation.
- Advanced delivery systems: Innovative delivery systems for easier electrode placement and reduced complication rates.
- Improved imaging: Integration of 3D mapping and advanced imaging techniques for more precise identification of the optimal stimulation site.
Expansion of clinical evidence
Several ongoing and planned studies will expand the clinical evidence base for left bundle branch pacing:
- Larger multicenter registry studies
- Randomized controlled trials compared to conventional pacing and CRT
- Long-term follow-up studies to assess stability and safety
- Studies on specific patient groups and optimal patient selection
Potential new areas of application
Based on the physiological advantages, new indications for left bundle branch pacing could develop in the future:
- Primary prevention of pacemaker-induced cardiomyopathy: In all patients with expected high pacing requirements.
- Alternative strategy for cardiac resynchronization: As a primary option for certain CRT candidates.
- Combined approaches: Hybrid strategies with left ventricular pacing or multisite pacing for optimized resynchronization.
Left bundle branch pacing: a promising future for physiological cardiac stimulation
Left bundle branch pacing represents a significant advance in the development of physiologic pacing methods and bridges the gap between conventional right ventricular pacing, His bundle pacing and traditional CRT. By directly pacing the left bundle branch, this technique offers a more physiologic activation of the heart with potentially improved clinical outcomes.
Although further research and longer follow-up periods are needed to fully evaluate long-term efficacy and safety, growing clinical evidence suggests significant advantages over conventional pacing therapy. With continued technological improvements and increasing clinical expertise, left bundle branch pacing has the potential to become an integral part of modern pacemaker therapy and revolutionize the care of patients with bradycardic arrhythmias and heart failure.
The future of physiological cardiac pacing lies in the precise adaptation of the pacing method to individual patient needs, and left bundle branch pacing will undoubtedly play a central role in this.
Note: This article is for informational purposes only and is not a substitute for medical advice. For specific medical questions about pacemaker therapy and left bundle branch pacing, please consult a cardiologist.

